Thoughts of Intelligent Design vs Evolution
(C) Copyright 2009 Jonzy

Given the 200th birthday of Charles Darwin has again stirred the debate with
those who believe in Creationism, latter called "Intelligent Design", thoughts
arise about both subjects.  History has shown humans came up with definitions
for matters that don't know answers to.  Case in point: Dragons, Witches, the
earth is flat, the Romans lack of a negative value, or the Sun revolving around
the Earth to name a few.  On the other hand, Evolution brings thoughts of man
evolving from Apes.

A person in favor of "Intelligent Design" may say: "how can I take a pile of
metal, rubber, and glass, encase it with dynamite, and blow it up to get an
automobile?  The creation of this automobile can only be done with Intelligence."
No argument here.  However, in rebuttal: I can take a pitre dish, fill it with
water, sit it on my window sill, and over time life will exist.  It may only
be mold, but is this not a form of life?

A person in favor of "Evolution" may say: "we evolved from Apes", yet this
statement is false.  We, humans, did not evolve from Apes.  Our lineage came
from the same branch of life, yet both species seperated paths long before
humans knew they were different from the Ape.

To believe in "Intelligent Design" is only that.  A belief.  The same goes
for "Evolution".  However, "Intelligent Design" has the same intellect as
Dragons, Witches, the earth is flat, or the Sun revolving around the Earth.
The so called 'theory' of "Evolution" is certainly a more plausible answer
to the question: "Where did we come from?"

I'm not saying there is no God.  I believe there was a man named Jesus, one
named Mohammad, Darwin, Neil Armstrong, and even D.B Cooper.  But I'll bet
you I could take that pitre dish, fill it with water, and after 4 billion
years there would be a form of life that could intelligently design some 
type of 'automobile'.